The concept is called "copyleft," instead of "copyright." Some such baloney like that.  It's "free use."

Nobody gets credit for writing the articles and nobody (so far) takes responsibility, either (even if the articles are edited along the line, which they are).  You can pretty much make things up and get them included on wikis.  That's one of the reasons they are so bad as a reference for anything.

Google "prem rawat + online encyclopedia," (singular) and you'll see that some premie(s) somewhere is working overtime, getting the articles out on many of these so-called founts of information called "wikis."  I hope the pay is good.