Not sure why first person, eye witness accounts by all of the Michaels isn't good enough for you.  Are you looking for more recent evidence?  Do you think that with the passage of time that their testimony has lost it's truthfulness?

Just curious.  Btw, you must know that it's difficult for ex-premies to give their names out these days -- the Rawat crowd certainly has proven themselves to be retaliatory, so I'm sure you would understand the hesitation.  There's good reason for it, as you know.

Of course, having said that, any new evidence is welcome, whether posted under real names or under an alias -- even "Jellydonut!"

Cynthia