Re: That’s not it
Re: That’s not it -- Jim Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
lesley ®

11/20/2017, 16:39:20
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
You're making me look it up again.  Here's another quote from 13 that should clear things up for you.

"I did not suggest that if the clothing had been part of the case, the Post would have mentioned it. Naturally, none of the reports contain everything that came out in court."

as far as the quote you want my input on - I understood his meaning from the first, I never thought he meant Breibart was making up the clothes thing at any point - this 'fact' of yours!  !  Goodness Jim, how does a misconception of yours, an honest misconception but one of them things nonetheless - how come that's now elevated to a fact!

your turn to read it through again - 13 has been clear - easy to understand and honest all the way through.  That's my opinion.






Previous Current page Next

Replies to this message