|
|
|
|||
|
| Ease up, Jim. |  | ||
| Re: I answered you. You didn’t answer me. Typical -- Jim | Top of thread | Post Reply | Forum |
|
Jim, Geez, Jim, I'm sorry not to have responded to you sooner, but maybe I have things to do in my life other than monitor this forum and respond to your demands. Who is acting childish today? Also, you seem to believe that there is this rule where if you answer somebody’s question you get to ask one back. Well, I don’t remember reading that rule in the forum guidelines, Jim. I’d say that’s a rule you’ve created on-the-fly for your own purposes. Additionally, and it’s kind of funny and maybe nitpicking, but you say you answered my question. Well, the two only valid answers to my question, Jim, were Yes or No. You answered with a ‘Probably’. Come on, you cannot be the slightest bit honest about using the WhatAboutism technique when you rely on it so often? It's as plain as day, Jim. Talk about being a hypocrite! No, you’re not a hypocrite. You’re a weasel for trying to slide out of a real answer. I really don’t want to give you much more of my precious time, but you need to hear this for your own good. Jim, back in the day some 20 years ago I and I believe many others thought you were the greatest voice on the forum fighting evil characters like SHP and Catweasel. You were magnificent. The great thing back then was that we all had a common enemy – Rawat, premies and premie thinking. Today, things are different. You rarely post on the Ex-Premie forum and when you do you often bring up your favorite topic, Islam. Now, so many years later we’re posting in the Non-Rawat forum and there is no common enemy. No, it’s one side against the other in the very divisive game of politics. Jim, I think because of your forum style you make the divisiveness much, much worse than it needs to ever be. You’re a nice guy in person, but in my opinion your 20 year old forum personality is a nasty piece of work. And you are especially nasty to me. Maybe it's because I actually try to stand up to you. Of course, you're the better orator and writer. That's your advantage. But, I think you're abusing it by abusing me and maybe others. Your posts to me are very frequently mean spirited. They are demeaning, derogatory and derisive. In fact, I would say they are hateful and spiteful. So, Jim, you’re asking me if I mock you? Gosh, what should I say? Probably? Should I say Probably, Jim? No, Jim, I’m just pushing back on the bullshit you are dumping on me whenever you get the opportunity, which seems like all the time. Things like:
And now because I understand what WhatAboutism is and how much you use it, I feel liberated and I’m going to call you on it whenever I see it. Jim, discussing anything with you always becomes just a frustrating mess because of your overuse of Whataboutism. How can you follow a discussion that avoids the main topic and jumps from one unverifiable accusation to another. You send us on these impossible missions to disprove or prove something about Hillary or Bill Clinton or Obama or whomever and there is no end. You’re just purposely wasting our time because you really don’t have answers to the questions or news items that we post. You are the one who is avoiding discussion, Jim. That is more than obvious to me. Your playbook is the Russian KGB playbook with all your WhatAboutisms. And you have got a lot of gall to ask me if I’m mocking you. No, you’re insulting me and every person on this forum on a daily basis with the nasty games you’ve been playing and I’m calling you out on it. Jim, I’ve spent as much time as I want to spend on this. All I will say is maybe it’s time for you to take an honest look at your behavior on this forum and possibly consider changing it for the better. Good night! |
| Previous | Current page | Next |
| Replies to this message |
|
