Great post, eDrek!
Re: How Jim uses WHATABOUTISM to derail discussions -- eDrek	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by: Cynthia ® 11/13/2017, 14:37:34 Author Profile Edit Alert Forum Admin Post Reply

And, btw, Wikipedia has gotten a lot better since I stopped trying to edit the Prem Rawat article.  lol! And I agree with you about Jim.  He consistently uses tu quoque logical fallacy (I love Latin) when posting here, which makes it dizzying at the least and at most, a Sisyphean task. Jim:  It's no fun conversing when I feel like I'm walking on eggshells.  If someone disagrees with you, your use of a hammer instead of words gets tiresome. Modified by Cynthia at Mon, Nov 13, 2017, 14:39:16

Previous

Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Thanks, Cynthia --- eDrek ( Mon, Nov 13, 2017, 14:43:50 ) ( 282 bytes ) You're not on eggshells, just thin ice --- Jim ( Mon, Nov 13, 2017, 15:56:48 ) ( 161 bytes ) +1 The "best" way to "win" an argument is to find an excuse ... --- Jim ( Mon, Nov 13, 2017, 16:01:33 ) ( 2 bytes )