Can't you answer anything? The Hill article categorically debunks the claim that no uranium left the states. Deal with it.
And yes, of course I read the Snopes story. What a joke it is. Fluff like this is a great example:
The timing of Telfer’s Clinton Foundation donations and Bill Clinton’s Renaissance Capital speaking fee might be questionable if there was reason to believe that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in the approval of the deal with Russia, but all the evidence points to the contrary — that Clinton did not play a pivotal role, and, in fact, may not have played any role at all. Moreover, neither Clinton nor her department possessed sole power of approval over said transaction.
As I showed you, the donations and payoff (Clinton's half million) came before, during and after the deal. The timeline I showed you explains all that. Did you read it? Want me to show it to you again? Here:
"Uranium investors
SEPTEMBER 2005
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier, wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia, days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.
2006
Uranium One
Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.
FEBRUARY 2007
UrAsia merges with a South African mining company and assumes the name Uranium One. In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.
JUNE 2008
Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom.
Rosatom
2008-2010
Uranium One and former UrAsia investors make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal.
JUNE 2009
Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One.
17% STAKE
2010-2011
Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
JUNE 2010
Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One, pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.
Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One or to take the company private.
JUNE 29, 2010
Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock.
OCTOBER 2010
Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States."
So what possible explanation can there be for all this money going to the Clintons this way other than the obvious inference which is that this was a massive payoff for favour. And don't forget, CFIUS signed off on the deal at the same time that the Russians were caught spying, bribing, money laundering and extorting to make it happen. Do you think that Holder told his fellow CFIUS members? Do you think Hillary knew? Why did the FBI put a gag order on their key witness and threaten to ruin him if he broke it?
Anyway, yeah, Clinton is going to jail.
