- The uranium deal... --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 23:44:07 ) ( 277 bytes ) +1
- Re: The uranium deal... --- PatD ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 23:58:17 ) ( 46 bytes ) +1
- Pat, as usual Snopes is laughably out to lunch --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 10:46:26 ) ( 197 bytes ) link +1
- Re: Pat, as usual Snopes is laughably out to lunch --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 11:54:09 ) ( 85 bytes ) +2
- Could this be any clearer? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:16:30 ) ( 8253 bytes ) +1
- Reads like an opinion piece and wishful thinking, Jim. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:21:44 ) ( 215 bytes ) +1
- Okay, this was lost on Drek (what a surprise!) but Pat, what do you think? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:35:06 ) ( 808 bytes ) +2
- Jim, have you actually watched it? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:38:58 ) ( 76 bytes ) +1
- Of course I have! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 13:43:53 ) ( 5896 bytes ) +1
- Here's something that might explain it to you, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:34:46 ) ( 2073 bytes ) +1
- Wrong --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:48:52 ) ( 26.2 KB ) link +1
- First, it doesn't matter that Clinton was "only" the Chair of CFIUS. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:52:14 ) ( 126 bytes ) +1
- I may be wrong about that -- can't find where I first saw it -- petty difference --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:33:41 ) ( 179 bytes ) +1
- Re: I may be wrong about that -- can't find where I first saw it -- petty dif... --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:38:13 ) ( 513 bytes ) +1
- What the hell?! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:39:49 ) ( 6560 bytes ) +1
- Sorry, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:42:49 ) ( 47 bytes ) +1
- strong circumstantial proof? --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:30:31 ) ( 281 bytes ) +1
- A striking example of Salon and Newsweek caught lying about Infowars --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:22:12 ) ( 505 bytes ) link +1
|
|