Dude, YOUR Attitude is showing
Re: What do YOU know about this? -- Jim	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by: eDrek ® 11/04/2017, 20:15:26 Author Profile Edit Alert Forum Admin Post Reply

Jim, you're such an asshole as usual.

Previous

Current page

Next

Replies to this message

All you can do is swear? --- Jim ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:18:09 ) ( 56 bytes ) +1 Don't change the subject, Jim. --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:23:31 ) ( 395 bytes ) +1 Oh wait. That's right Hillary colluded with the Russians!!! --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:33:08 ) ( 147 bytes ) +3 No, Hillary is going to jail because of Pizzagate --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:39:40 ) ( 214 bytes ) Re: Oh wait. That's right Hillary colluded with the Russians!!! --- Jim ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 22:13:04 ) ( 18 bytes ) Re: Oh wait. That's right Hillary colluded with the Russians!!! --- PatD ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 22:37:45 ) ( 852 bytes ) +1 The uranium deal... --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 23:44:07 ) ( 277 bytes ) +1 Re: The uranium deal... --- PatD ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 23:58:17 ) ( 46 bytes ) +1 Pat, as usual Snopes is laughably out to lunch --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 10:46:26 ) ( 197 bytes ) link +1 Re: Pat, as usual Snopes is laughably out to lunch --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 11:54:09 ) ( 85 bytes ) +2 Could this be any clearer? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:16:30 ) ( 8253 bytes ) +1 Reads like an opinion piece and wishful thinking, Jim. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:21:44 ) ( 215 bytes ) +1 Okay, this was lost on Drek (what a surprise!) but Pat, what do you think? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:35:06 ) ( 808 bytes ) +2 Jim, have you actually watched it? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:38:58 ) ( 76 bytes ) +1 Of course I have! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 13:43:53 ) ( 5896 bytes ) +1 Here's something that might explain it to you, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:34:46 ) ( 2073 bytes ) +1 Wrong --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:48:52 ) ( 26.2 KB ) link +1 First, it doesn't matter that Clinton was "only" the Chair of CFIUS. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:52:14 ) ( 126 bytes ) +1 I may be wrong about that -- can't find where I first saw it -- petty difference --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:33:41 ) ( 179 bytes ) +1 Re: I may be wrong about that -- can't find where I first saw it -- petty dif... --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:38:13 ) ( 513 bytes ) +1 What the hell?! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:39:49 ) ( 6560 bytes ) +1 Sorry, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:42:49 ) ( 47 bytes ) +1 What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:06:32 ) ( 165 bytes ) +1 Re: What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:17:16 ) ( 83 bytes ) +2 Impossible to reason with someone who lacks both information or sincerity --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:29:38 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1 When stumped and angry: Throw mud and disparage. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:33:14 ) ( 236 bytes ) +1 It doesn't matter if you "care" for my sources of "so-called f... --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:42:59 ) ( 358 bytes ) +1 Jim, no offense, but I don't think you really care about the TRUTH --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:49:41 ) ( 133 bytes ) +1 Impossible .... --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 22:33:09 ) ( 2 bytes ) Re: What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:30:34 ) ( 352 bytes ) +1 Re: What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 20:01:55 ) ( 166 bytes ) +1 Jim's Playbook: When out of answers call people more names --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 20:21:06 ) ( 385 bytes ) strong circumstantial proof? --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:30:31 ) ( 281 bytes ) +1 Oh my god, don't tell me that 13 doesn't know what he's talking about! No! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:41:46 ) ( 4106 bytes ) link +1 13, you've blown your credibility. What do YOU know? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:46:27 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1 Re: 13, you've blown your credibility. What do YOU know? --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:13:50 ) ( 381 bytes ) +1 I think you're guilty as charged --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:25:11 ) ( 1722 bytes ) +1 Re: I think you're guilty as charged --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:36:19 ) ( 843 bytes ) +1 Re: I think you're guilty as charged --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:47:44 ) ( 493 bytes ) +1 Re: I think you're guilty as charged --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:54:22 ) ( 361 bytes ) A striking example of Salon and Newsweek caught lying about Infowars --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:22:12 ) ( 505 bytes ) link +1 Alex Jones just pretends to be insane --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:28:29 ) ( 350 bytes ) link +1 What’s wrong? Can’t handle the facts? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:38:29 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1 What's wrong is Alex Jones --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:41:24 ) ( 259 bytes ) +1 That’s ridiculous --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:51:06 ) ( 196 bytes ) +1 That's ridiculous, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:01:36 ) ( 503 bytes ) +1 Isn't that what a troll does? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:28:37 ) ( 425 bytes ) +1 When stumped or angry: Call people names --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:38:51 ) ( 1032 bytes )