Re: As usual, liberals lied and distorted what this was all about
Re: As usual, liberals lied and distorted what this was all about -- Jim	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by: 13 ® 11/04/2017, 17:51:36 Author Profile Edit Alert Forum Admin Post Reply

I'm just laughing at the paranoid lunacy behind it all. You pick your team's of experts and away you go, into your own bubble. Haha. Other teams of experts are available.

Previous

Current page

Next

Replies to this message

This is a 'trumped' up non-issue. It's fake news. --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 17:55:45 ) ( 118 bytes ) +1 What do YOU know about this? --- Jim ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:13:27 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1 Dude, YOUR Attitude is showing --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:15:26 ) ( 43 bytes ) +1 All you can do is swear? --- Jim ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:18:09 ) ( 56 bytes ) +1 Don't change the subject, Jim. --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:23:31 ) ( 395 bytes ) +1 Oh wait. That's right Hillary colluded with the Russians!!! --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:33:08 ) ( 147 bytes ) +3 No, Hillary is going to jail because of Pizzagate --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:39:40 ) ( 214 bytes ) Re: Oh wait. That's right Hillary colluded with the Russians!!! --- Jim ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 22:13:04 ) ( 18 bytes ) Re: Oh wait. That's right Hillary colluded with the Russians!!! --- PatD ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 22:37:45 ) ( 852 bytes ) +1 The uranium deal... --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 23:44:07 ) ( 277 bytes ) +1 Re: The uranium deal... --- PatD ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 23:58:17 ) ( 46 bytes ) +1 Pat, as usual Snopes is laughably out to lunch --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 10:46:26 ) ( 197 bytes ) link +1 Re: Pat, as usual Snopes is laughably out to lunch --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 11:54:09 ) ( 85 bytes ) +2 Could this be any clearer? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:16:30 ) ( 8253 bytes ) +1 Reads like an opinion piece and wishful thinking, Jim. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:21:44 ) ( 215 bytes ) +1 Okay, this was lost on Drek (what a surprise!) but Pat, what do you think? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:35:06 ) ( 808 bytes ) +2 Jim, have you actually watched it? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:38:58 ) ( 76 bytes ) +1 Of course I have! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 13:43:53 ) ( 5896 bytes ) +1 Here's something that might explain it to you, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:34:46 ) ( 2073 bytes ) +1 Wrong --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:48:52 ) ( 26.2 KB ) link +1 First, it doesn't matter that Clinton was "only" the Chair of CFIUS. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:52:14 ) ( 126 bytes ) +1 I may be wrong about that -- can't find where I first saw it -- petty difference --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:33:41 ) ( 179 bytes ) +1 Re: I may be wrong about that -- can't find where I first saw it -- petty dif... --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:38:13 ) ( 513 bytes ) +1 What the hell?! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:39:49 ) ( 6560 bytes ) +1 Sorry, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:42:49 ) ( 47 bytes ) +1 What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:06:32 ) ( 165 bytes ) +1 Re: What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:17:16 ) ( 83 bytes ) +2 Impossible to reason with someone who lacks both information or sincerity --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:29:38 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1 When stumped and angry: Throw mud and disparage. --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:33:14 ) ( 236 bytes ) +1 It doesn't matter if you "care" for my sources of "so-called f... --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:42:59 ) ( 358 bytes ) +1 Jim, no offense, but I don't think you really care about the TRUTH --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:49:41 ) ( 133 bytes ) +1 Impossible .... --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 22:33:09 ) ( 2 bytes ) Re: What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:30:34 ) ( 352 bytes ) +1 Re: What possible excuse do you have for saying that? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 20:01:55 ) ( 166 bytes ) +1 Jim's Playbook: When out of answers call people more names --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 20:21:06 ) ( 385 bytes ) strong circumstantial proof? --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:30:31 ) ( 281 bytes ) +1 Oh my god, don't tell me that 13 doesn't know what he's talking about! No! --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:41:46 ) ( 4106 bytes ) link +1 13, you've blown your credibility. What do YOU know? --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 14:46:27 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1 Re: 13, you've blown your credibility. What do YOU know? --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:13:50 ) ( 381 bytes ) +1 I think you're guilty as charged --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 15:25:11 ) ( 1722 bytes ) +1 Re: I think you're guilty as charged --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:36:19 ) ( 843 bytes ) +1 Re: I think you're guilty as charged --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:47:44 ) ( 493 bytes ) +1 Re: I think you're guilty as charged --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:54:22 ) ( 361 bytes ) A striking example of Salon and Newsweek caught lying about Infowars --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:22:12 ) ( 505 bytes ) link +1 Alex Jones just pretends to be insane --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:28:29 ) ( 350 bytes ) link +1 What’s wrong? Can’t handle the facts? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:38:29 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1 What's wrong is Alex Jones --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:41:24 ) ( 259 bytes ) +1 That’s ridiculous --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 12:51:06 ) ( 196 bytes ) +1 That's ridiculous, Jim --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 16:01:36 ) ( 503 bytes ) +1 Isn't that what a troll does? --- Jim ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:28:37 ) ( 425 bytes ) +1 When stumped or angry: Call people names --- eDrek ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 17:38:51 ) ( 1032 bytes ) As usual, you don't know enough about this to have an informed opinion --- Jim ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:10:25 ) ( 352 bytes ) +2 Yeah, 13, you don't care about the TRUTH. You need to educate yourself. --- eDrek ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 20:19:56 ) ( 340 bytes ) +1 Re : Clever sign on Hawaii tarmac --- auggie55 ( Sat, Nov 04, 2017, 22:19:49 ) ( 252 bytes ) I can't follow you down that rabbit hole --- 13 ( Sun, Nov 05, 2017, 01:58:36 ) ( 328 bytes )