Re: Aquinas: a Q&A
Re: Re: Fake -- Aquinas Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
prembio ®

12/23/2023, 19:44:42
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
I was recently speaking to a person interested in NRMS and I was telling her about that very thing in DLM. The Holy Family get black-balled by GMJ and instantly not a good word ever said about them again. They were in their minds. Forgotten. Into a black hole.

Destroy all the magazines and tapes? No problem.

This Knowledge cannot be spread throughout the world without these great souls the Mahatmas. All back to India these fakes and rapists. They were never mentioned again.

Everything could change from one day to the next, no questions asked. 

Then I thought, from one day to the next (almost), Rawat completely changed his vocabulary dropping off lots of words that had been very important in his speeches and beginning to create a new version of his claims without the Indian backstory. Maybe they edited out his fluffs. I've got one audio tape of an early 80s satsang that still had a single person shouting Bolie Shri Satguru d (and then in her mind, whoops I'm the only person about to shout Ki Jai, I must not have heard an agya, are we back in 1976? how embarassing) at the end of the tape. Someone must have forgot to cut it off the end of the tape.

In your days skulking about the stage, did you ever see him ever use a prompter or a list of points to get him back on track or anything like that at all?






Previous Current page Next

Replies to this message